Washington Correpsondent Lenders are forced to have Consumer Loan License

DbToday’s Mortgage Brokers Commission meeting was attended by many concerned mortgage brokers and correspondent lenders (brokers with warehouse lines of credit) who feel as though they’ve had a real doozy pulled over them by recent legislation, specifically SB 6471.   Deb Bortner of DFI (bad photo compliments of my Treo) insists that it was not DFI’s intentions to rope in the correspondent lenders who are licensed as mortgage brokers to be regulated by the Consumer Loan Act.

Many Washington State correspondent lenders (and we, loan originators who work for a correspondent lender) are feeling very frustrated (to sugar coat it).  A majority of us have abided by the State’s licensing laws, paid our dues, passed our background checks and the exam…even if we were not a “true” broker.  We played along and played by the rules.  In an attempt to “capture” a few Correspondents who apparently do not broker (they’re direct endorsed lenders, like Mortgage Master, except we will broker a small portion of our loans), who were exempt from the Mortgage Brokers Practice Act, the State decided to deem any mortgage broker with a warehouse line (i.e. Correspondent Lenders) will now be regulated under the Consumer Loan Act.   Correspondent Lenders can retain both licenses and be held liable accountable under both acts, or just maintain their newly required Consumer Loan License.   There’s significant expenses for both licenses which I may or may not get into in a future post. 

After Deb Bortner defended DFI’s position, she handed the floor over to the audience and here’s a few of the comments from “the floor” of brokers that  I found interesting (I’m paraphrasing, since I was not able to write fast enough and I’m not quoting the individual broker):

“This [obtaining a consumer loan license] goes against every value we have in our business.  We can now hire felons, are no longer required to do continue education and the consumer will pay.   What you’re doing is STUPID.”

“This is a nasty little bill with nasty little consequences.”

“We are Correspondent Lenders.  We are different than Mortgage Brokers and we are NOT a Pawn Shop.”

“I wish the media was here to see all of these mortgage brokers fighting for the consumer.”

“For half of the mortgage industry to have to go through the licensing again is crazy.”

“Everyday that goes by is less chance of closing a loan.  We [correspondent lenders] have the ability to draw docs and close loans quicker and more efficiently than true mortgage brokers.”

“How many lenders were actually not licensed through the loophole?  It seems the motivation here is more taxes.”

“What is DFI going to do with all the extra money?”

Mortgage Brokers and Correspondent Lenders, your next chance to hear what DFI has to say is next week in Bellevue on Tuesday, May 13–however you must RSVP by this Friday, May 9, 2008.  For more information, click here.   As of midnight, June 11, 2008, if you have a warehouse line of credit and you’re a mortgage broker or correspondent lender, you need a Consumer Loan License.

Update on Mortgage Broker/Correspondent Lender DFI Meeting

Thanks to Jillayne Schlicke for posting this because I personally didn’t receive anyword from DFI (I do receive emails regarding the Mortgage Broker Commission meetings)…this one hits close to home as the company I work for, Mortgage Master, is a Correspondent Lender.   DFI did send an email to the President of our company however NOTHING was on their site when she told me about this.

So this is another shout out to all the mortgage brokers in Washington State, especially those impacted by SB 6471, which in my opinion seems to have been passed this quite conveniently by telling WAMB this would not impact mortgage brokers.   WRONG.  Mortgage brokers who have a warehouse line (correspondent lenders) are going to be dramatically impacted by this law.

Meeting Of The Mortgage Broker Commission To Discuss The Impacts Of SB 6471
May 7, 2008, at 1:00 p.m.
Renton Community Center, Banquet Room (100 max capacity)
1715 Maple Valley Highway
Renton, WA (Driving Directions)

Please attend and pass the word!

How to Apply On-Line for a Mortgage Preapproval

I recently had this excellent question from one my readers who is interested in getting preapproved:

I began filling out the loan application on the web, but stopped once I reached the part about the specific property, as I don’t currently have a property in mind.  I believe what I am seeking to do [is] a true preapproval letter.  I did read your post which clarified the difference between prequalification and preapproval.  Is there a way to submit the full-doc information to you electronically to start the process for preapproval?

Mortgage Porter’s On-line Application (under Favorite Links) allows you to apply for mortgage preapproval before you have a property address.   This is question is very valid because there is not a formal way to select that the property has not yet been found.  Ideally, home buyers should get preapproved before they make an offer on a home.  Anyhow, where the application asks for a property address, simply enter:

123 TBD St., Your City, WA, Your Zip  (NOTE:  I’m only licensed to help those who need a mortgage in Washington State).

During these historic times in our mortgage industry (and actually, in any time) it’s crucial to get preapproved BEFORE you begin to shop for your next home.

I’m really glad that I was emailed this question so I could address it…otherwise, I might not have caught this.   Thanks!

My 22nd Anniversary in the RE Biz

I should stop saying how long I’ve been around the real estate industry!  On May 1, 1986, a very bright-eyed and naive young Rhonda Christopherson, began my first “real job” at Safeco Title Insurance Company as a doc-puller (we were bought a year later by Chicago Title, where I worked in Unit 5).   

After 14 years in the title industry, I made the move to mortgage and I’ve been helping Washington families with their Mortgage Planning needs for the past 8 years…the rest is history!Seahawks_3

Yes…that is Chuck Knox, that was my hair style in the 80s and yes, I’m wearing yellow Reeboks with actual jersey. 

What’s a Lock Confirmation?

A lock confirmation is a written document that your Mortgage Professional should provide you once your interest rate is locked.   In fact, if you don’t receive a Lock Confirmation once you have instructed your loan originator to lock, demand one.  No skirting from the Loan Originator allowed!

Your Lock-In Agreement/Confirmation should include the following information:

  • Date the loan was locked
  • Borrowers Names
  • Property Address
  • Loan Amount
  • Lock Expiration Date
  • Interest Rate
  • Origination Fee
  • Discount Point
  • Whether or not there’s a Prepayment Penalty
  • ARM information (Margin, Index, Adjustment Caps, Life Cap and if it features a Conversion Option)
  • Any lock in fees (including non-refundable) if any.  This generally applies towards locks with longer lock periods.
  • Terms of the lock (see below)
  • Signature place for borrowers
  • Signature of Loan Originator
  • Name and Address of Mortgage Company

Why is this so important?  For starters, once you agree to lock in a certain interest rate, a clock begins ticking and counting down towards the lock expiration date.  If you get too close to that date, you may need a lock extension which could have a fee depending on what the pricing is at that time.   

Equally, and possibly more important, you want to make sure that your Loan Originator has in fact locked your mortgage rate.   There are some Loan Originators out there who will say they have locked in your rate when in fact, they have not.  They’re gambling the market with hopes of still locking in your rate at what they have told you, but they’ll make a little extra on the back end OR the rate you want isn’t quite available so they’re gambling the market will improve and they’ll lock you once that rate appears.   But what if it doesn’t?   Having a document that shows that the Loan Originator committed that rate to you may help you should you need to make them honor the rate (you may have to seek their manager or higher).

It’s quite possible, especially in this volatile of a market where we are averaging two rate changes per day, that you may give the LO permission to lock in your rate and when they go to do so (even if it’s the moment you hang up the phone), the rates may be changing.  A Mortgage Professional will be upfront with you and let you know if this has happened (for better or worse).   An actual Lock-In Agreement/Confirmation should not be provided until the rate is actually locked in. 

Changes to the loan application may also impact the mortgage rate which would then change the lock.  For example:

  • Credit score changes during the transaction discovered from a new report may impact the rate for better or worse.
  • Changes in loan to value (after the appraisal is received).
  • Change in level of documentation for the loan.
  • Loan programs being terminated or guidelines tightened.
  • Investor pricing changes with less time permitted than what the lock will allow.
  • Information on loan application not accurate, misrepresented or changes (such as employment or the Underwriter determines occupancy to be different than stated on application).

Again, a Mortgage Professional will notify you of these changes and how they impact you as soon as they become aware.

Some lenders also offer a Forward Lock Agreement which is different than a confirmation…I’ll give you the scoop on a Forward Lock in another post soon.  Stay tuned!

Fed’s 0.25% Cut All Ready Baked in the Cake

BakedcakeToday the FOMC cut the Fed Funds Rate by 0.25% to 2.00% and the Discount Rate by  0.25% to 2.25%.  These rate cuts do not directly  impact mortgage interest rates.

Mortgage interest rates are based on mortgage backed securities (bonds).  How bond traders react to the Fed Rate cuts and the Fed Statements that correspond to this cut, will impact mortgage interest rates.  To read today’s FOMC statement, click here:

[Read more…]

Don’t Throw Your Loan Officer Mama from the Train

Thowmama

I had an amazing experience which I just have to share…the positive point is that  the buyer did wind up with her home but it was under the brunt of stress that was unnecessary.   You see, sometimes when things begin to go wrong in a transaction, fingers will waive and point vigorously undeservedly.   People will want to remain shiny, positive and virtuous to their referral provider and will therefor, throw someone "under a bus" or "into a train".  I was recently almost thrown and I spared myself fighting all the way.

We had loan documents to the escrow company just over a week prior to closing (still pretty darn good)…no HUD-1 from the escrow company until a day before the buyer was signing (after many request for an estimated HUD-1.  I want to review them to make sure my closing costs from the Good Faith Estimate are in line with the Estimated HUD-1 Settlement Statement).   

The client signs two days before closing and I assume all is well until I receive a panicked call from the home buyer on closing day stating that we are not closing.  She’s very upset because she has learned from the Listing Agent and the Escrow Company that her purchase is not funding because my company released it too late.  This is a total surprise to me since our office did fund on the transaction.

My first step, after calling my client to let her know that I’m "on it" and that this is news to me (because escrow NEVER called me) is to call escrow and find out "what’s up".  At this point, it’s 4ish in the afternoon and there are no more new recordings taking place at the county. 

The Escrow Officer is schmoozy and tells me that we (the mortgage company) released the recording a little late which made it difficult for the title company to get documents to the county.  I let the EO know that previous to lending, I was in the title industry where my career began with recording documents and ended with managing an escrow branch.  The EO had days (a week) to sign the client and provide documents to the title company for recording…yet she’s still trying to pin the blame on the mortgage company.  We, in fact, have emails to the escrow officer confirming she has our wire and she’s okay at proceed with recording. 

Although this EO returns our funding package two days before closing (thanks to how many days in advance we provided the loan package to her) yet waits until the day of closing to send the loan documents to the title company.   She tried to tell me that we released too late at 2pm when I know that the county courthouse will take recordings until 3:30.  I’ve done many "walk on’s" myself way back "in the day".  Regardless, she and/or the title company could have had the documents to the court house MUCH earlier.

I only learned about the recording mishap only because my client called me ready to rip my face off since she was told this was the fault of lender when it was anything but the case. 

The escrow officer and title company are lucky that I’m not naming them.  I’m not one to bash (although check back if this happens again)!   As someone who was in the title and escrow industry for so many years, there is no way that I would have unjustly thrown someone "under the train" and I find it extremely concerning that the only way we learned about recording/closing issues was from the buyer.  If the buyer had not called us late in the day, we would have had NO idea that the loan we funded on did not record.  Why didn’t the Escrow Officer contact us?  A short staff is no excuse for not contacting the mortgage company (when the EO did communicate with the buyer and agents).  In fact, there is no excuse.

How did this wind up?  The title and escrow company have both since admitted fault.  The title company is going to indemnify the transaction as if it had closed on the day it should have.  And the buyer did get her keys to her new home.

What happened to working together?  I don’t remember throwing Mortgage Professionals under the train or bus like I’ve witnessed recently–are EO’s so afraid of losing business they’ll make a sacrifice play to impress their agents?

NOTE: My preferred title and escrow company contacted me concerned this could appear as if it where one of their Escrow Officers that "threw me off the train".  Without naming names, this was a different company. 

 

Calling All Washington State Correspondent Lenders

Did you receive the notice from DFI last Thursday regarding new licensing requirements impacting Correspondent Lenders?  Here’s a portion of the email I received from Deborah Bortner, Director of the Division of Consumer Services.

"Senate Bill 6471 (chapter 78, Laws of 2008), passed by legislature, and signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008, requires that all lenders doing business in Washington be licensed by the Department of Financial Institutions under the Consumer Loan ACT (CLA), chapter 31.04 RCW.  The law becomes effective June 12, 2008."

I’m still digesting all of this…it’s my understanding that if lenders wish to retain their status as a Correspondent Lender in Washington State, they will need to apply for (an expensive) Consumer Loan License.   Gee, I guess that means we can all do loans with double digit interest rates now–how is this helping the consumer?  It certainly doesn’t help lenders…it IS more money for the Evergreen State.

WAMB responded the following day via email:

Many of you received an email from the Department of Financial Institutions on Thursday regarding new licensing requirements for Washington State Lenders.  This email was a result of the passage of Senate Bill 6471 concerning consumer finance companies.  Please know we were not aware of this issue until we also received the notification by email from DFI yesterday.

During the legislation session we were made aware of Senate Bill 6471 and were told that the intent of this legislation was to require that all Consumer Finance Companies who were operating as Mortgage Brokers become licensed.  We were advised that it was not a mortgage broker concern.

Apparently the passage of this legislation has created some unintended consequences for brokers.  The legislation would require any mortgage broker with a correspondent line to also become licensed as a consumer finance company.  We know that if this legislation is put into effect on June 12, it will have an impact on a large segment of WAMB’s membership.   WAMB is working with the Mortgage Broker Commission to minimize these consequences through the Rules Process…."

Well my lending Brothers and Sisters, I highly recommend that you attend the next Mortgage Broker Commission Meeting…it’s sure to be a doozy and we, few and proud, Correspondents must be heard.

Mortgage Brokers Commission Meeting:  Tuesday, May 13, 2008 beginning at 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. at Bellevue City Hall’s Council Chambers.  Bellevue City Hall, 450 110th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA 98009.   DFI wants you to fax your RSVP’s with your name, company name, address, phone & fax number to Elizabeth Stancil at 360-586-5068.  Here is a form you can use to RSVP: Download MortgageBrokersCommissionMeetingMay13.pdf

I hope to see you there.  RSVPs are needed by May 9, 2008.