It’s not unusual these days to have a lender request a “letter of explanation” from a home buyer or someone who is buying or refinancing their home. A letter of explanation (or LOE) is often used to help provide more information to the underwriter or lender based on information that is disclosed on an application or credit report. LOE’s may address anything from gaps in employment to inquiries on a credit report and is intended to help explain or add support to the transaction. If a borrower has had an extenuating circumstance and is trying to have an exception made to an underwriting guideline, they may be asked to write a LOE.
Explaining the “Letter of Explanation”
Buying Your First Investment Property
EDITORS NOTE: This post was written in 2011. Some of the programs, like Fannie MaeHomePath, may no longer be available.
With real estate becoming more affordable and mortgage interest rates at an historic low, it’s easy to see why some people are considering buying their first investment property. Financing an investment property has more requirements to it than buying an owner occupied property because it carries more risk to the lender. However if you have enough income, plenty of reserves set aside and good credit, you may be surprised how easy the process can be and what programs are available.
My thoughts on NAR’s Pending Home Sales for April: Mortgage Guidelines are NOT “Excessively Tight”
This morning NAR released the Pending Home Sales report which revealed that "contract signings, dropped 11.6 percent in April from a downwardly revised 92.6 in March. The index is 26.5 percent below a cyclical peak of 111.5 in April 2010 when buyers were rushing to beat the contract deadline for the home buyer tax credit." Pending home sales is a forward indicator since it's reporting on contracts that are signed but not yet closed.
Lawrence Yun, NAR's Chief Economist states that part of reason for the larger than expected drop is due to how difficult it has become to obtain a mortgage.
“No doubt the continuing excessively tight mortgage underwriting process is making the housing market recovery unnecessarily slow…We simply have to get back to sound, common-sense lending standards to provide mortgages to creditworthy borrowers who are buying homes well within their means. Bank balance sheets show rising cash reserves and declining loan balances – it’s time to loosen the purse strings….”
It's my experience that it's not that difficult to obtain a mortgage and underwriting guidelines are not "excessively tight". The difference between qualifying for a mortgage now and pre-2007 is that borrowers must now prove (provide supporting documentation) that they meet program guidelines. Stated income, low or no-doc loans are gone.
- Every penny of your down payment and funds for closing must be documented with complete bank statements (all pages) or other asset accounts being used.
- Large deposits on your bank statements must be sourced (more documentation) to show where the funds came from.
- Employment must be steady. Buyers are not required to have been on the same job for the past two years…heck, they can be out of college (may count as employment) and there may be some unemployment periods…it needs to make sense and be documented.
- Income must be steady. If a potential borrower is not paid salary (hourly, commission, bonus, self-employed, etc.) they need to show they've received this type of income for the past two years.
- Borrowers must be able to afford their home based on their income and debts. Some debts where payments are deferred, like student loans, are factored into your debt-to-income ratios…one day, you are going to have to make payments on it!
- Borrowers who take out new debts before funding (closing) of their loan, may find they no longer qualify for their mortgage. Doesn't this make sense? Yes, home buyers may need new a washer and dryer…however if they're borderline with their credit or pushed with their qualifying ratios, they risk blowing up the purchase just before closing due to "LQI". Home buyers need to make sure they honestly reflect the loan application from the start of the transaction to finish.
Okay, I'll admit that credit scoring has become tougher. Pre-2007, a person with 600 credit scores (or lower) could qualify for a mortgage. Now you pretty much need a mid-credit score of 630 or higher for most loan programs. And their are price hits (risked based pricing) that are factored into interest rates based on loan to value and credit scores. Credit scores are reflective and borrowers can work on improving their credit scores (and should).
Income is also scrutinized more than before with 4506Ts being required on every transaction. If your income is higher on your loan application than what you claim on your tax returns, be prepared…you'll be providing additional documentation (tax returns) even if you're paid a salary and your income may be adjusted lower.
Here's where Congress may really muck up the housing recovery, especially in light of this report:
- Lowering the conforming loan limits, which is scheduled to happen on October 1, 2011. In the Seattle area, the current conforming loan limit is $567,500. Effective October 1, 2011, it's set to roll back to $506,000 meaning that loan amounts of $506,001 or higher will be "jumbo" non-conforming. Jumbo loans have much tougher guidelines and higher rates which does mean that fewer people will qualify for higher priced homes. Loan limits are also set to be reduced for FHA and VA loans after September 30, 2011. By the way, 2012 loan limits may be even lower!
- Increasing the minimum down payment for FHA loans from 3.5% to 5%. Congress is working on this right now and it's been tossed around by our government for quite a while. Does having 1.5% more "skin" in the game really make a more responsible borrower? I don't think so. I would rather see that a borrower have that 1.5% in their savings than invested as down payment (where they do not have access to it should they have an emergency) in a home.
People can still get a mortgage today. It bothers me that NAR and others are painting that mortgages are too tough to obtain…painting an inaccurate picture does not help the housing market either. Today's buyer needs to be prepared to provide plenty of paperwork to support they actually qualify for the mortgage by showing they earn what they say, have the funds for closing and are employed. What's wrong with that?
If you are considering buying a home, I do recommend meeting with a local licensed mortgage professional as early as possible to start on the prequalification process. If your next home is located anywhere in Washington State, I'm happy to help you!
PS: I still believe that it would tremendously help the housing markets recover IF home owners who want to refinance and who qualify based on credit, income and employment are allowed to without an appraisal…very similar to an FHA streamline refi. This would allow people who want to stay in their homes and who qualify, to be able to take advantage of today's lower rates and not cause them to be punished due to lower appraised values.
How much can Sellers contribute towards Closing Cost?
If negotiated in your purchase and sales agreement, a Seller may agree to chip in towards some or all of your bona fide closing costs, prepaids and reserves. They cannot contribute towards your down payment. The amount the seller can contribute varies depending on the program type and the amount of home buyer’s down payment. The percentage is based on the sales price and if the credit exceeds the closing cost, the mortgage originator can often use it towards discount points to buy down the interest rate.
Income Limits and Property Qualifications for USDA Rural Loans
NOTE: USDA INCOME LIMITS HAVE BEEN UPDATED SINCE THIS POST WAS PUBLISHED.
USDA is a government backed program that allows zero down payment on homes that are in a designated rural community for families earning less than a certain income. A majority of Washington State single family residences (homes and condos) qualify…of course if you live in metropolitan areas like Seattle or Bellevue, odds are your home will not. To qualify, families must be without "adequate housing" (may not own a home or adequate home), must have reasonable credit history and be able to afford the mortgage (29/41 is the debt to income ratio guidelines). I've written more details about USDA home loans on this earlier post.
Income limits vary by county and the entire household income is considered (not just the primary borrowers or those borrowers on the mortgage) for determining if the income meets the guidelines. This is separate from income considered for "debt-to-income" ratios. USDA loans allow incomes up to 115% of the median income for the area. Income limits vary on household size from 1-4 person or 5-8 person.
As of the publishing of this article, in Washington, the income limits by county are:
- King and Snohomish Counties: 1-4 Person $92,600 | 5-8 Person $122,250
- Island County: 1-4 Person $89,550 | 5-8 Person $118,200
- Clark, Kitsap and Thurston Counties: 1-4 Person $82,650 | 5-8 Person $109,100
- Pierce County: 1-4 Person $80,050 | 5-8 Person $105,650
- All other Washington counties: 1-4 Person $74,050 | 5-8 Person $97,750
You can check current USDA income limits by visiting the USDA site (clicking here)…be sure to click the "guaranteed" option. Income limits can and do change. You can also use USDA's income eligibility calculator which will factor in deductions to income. You're looking for the "guaranteed" results and not "direct".
Income used to determine if a family is under the household income limits includes all those (18 years and older) who will be living in the home regardless of whether or not they're on the mortgage. Incomes of children over 18 who working AND who are full time students are not factored.
Once you've determined that you meet the household income limits, the next step is to see to see what communities in your area are eligible for USDA financing. You don't have to go too far from Seattle or Bellevue to find homes that do qualify for this type of mortgage. Using the USDA site, under "Property Eligibility" click "Single Family Dwelling". From there you can either enter a specific address or click on the map to narrow down your search.
Sellers and real estate agents who are working in neighborhoods that qualify should be sure to include this program as an option they'll consider for financing on their offers.
I'm pleased to offer USDA financing as an option for borrowers who meet the criteria since there is no private mortgage insurance and the program is a 30 year fixed rate. If you have any questions regarding USDA or other mortgage programs for financing homes located anywhere in Washington State, please contact me, I'm happy to help!
Calculating Bonus Income
Here's a question from one of my readers (not one of my clients) regarding how bonus income is treated for qualifying for a mortgage:
I am trying to close on a property and the loan processor is giving me a hard time about my income. I am suppose to make $53,000 this year. Last year I made $50,000 according to my W2. My base salary is locked at $32,000 with the other income being a commission or bonus based off my offices profit.
Currently the loan processor is taking my year to date bonus/commission and dividing it by 12. She is stating that this is how they are the bonus income is annualized so it is making it seem like my projected income for the year will be 32,000 + approx 5,000 = 37,000. This is making my income to debt ratio pretty low. Do you have any advice on how I can get this adjusted or if this is actually the correct way my income should be calculated?
Lenders are looking for trends with income. Since your base income is a salary, the processor can give you credit for the entire amount. If your additional income is bonus or commission, then lenders may go back 24 months to create an average bonus/commission income. If your income is trending lower, best case–the lender may use the current average for your commission/bonus income. Lenders are looking for "stable" income…if the income is considered unstable, there may be issues.
Most lenders will typically go back 24 months including year to date bonus income; and average it since this type of income fluctuates and is not a guaranteed fixed amount. Hopefully your bonus income in 2009 is close to what your 2010 bonus income was and shows a positive income trend. You need to document that you've been receiving your bonus income for a minimum of two years.
2009 = $20,000 Bonus Income
2010 = $23,000 Bonus Income
3/31/11 = $5,000 Bonus Income
$48,000 divided by 27 (24 plus 3 months) = $1778 monthly bonus income.
If the base salary is $32,000; your loan application will reflect base monthly gross income of $2667. (32k divided by 12 months). Even if the base salary was lower in previous years, the current base (assuming it's a bona fide salary) is what is used to determine current monthly income for qualifying for a mortgage.
$2667 plus $1778 = $4,445 averaged monthly income (based on the example above).
Another factor to keep in mind is that lenders will pull 4506 Request for Tax Transcripts so if you write-off significant amounts of your business expenses, this may deducted from what the lender uses for your income.
Verification of Employment forms (VOE) will be sent to your employer to verify that your bonus is likely to continue. If your lender is relying on a Verification of Employment for your bonus income, they may annualized it (divide the current year to date amount by 12 months) instead of using an average. Plus, if your employer indicates that the bonus income is not likely to continue, it should not be used for qualifying purposes.
Dear Reader:
It appears to me that the processor is "annualizing" your bonus income ($5000 divided by 12 = $417) instead of averaging.
Talk to your mortgage originator about supply documentation (last two years tax returns, W2s and/or 1099s) to support your income to see if this will change how the processor is calculating your income.
Good luck!
5 Ways to Derail Your Loan Approval
You’re getting ready to buy a home or refinance your home with your closing day around the corner when your mortgage originator contacts you to let you know there may be a problem. Some issues may not revealed until days or sometimes weeks into a transaction. Anytime documentation is provided to the mortgage company, it has the potential to raise more questions or require more documentation to satisfy underwriting guidelines. Here are five situations to be aware of that can cause headaches during the loan process.
Determining Net Rental Income when Qualifying for a Mortgage
EDITORS NOTE – 11/22/2014: Oh the joys of writing a mortgage blog… guidelines change constantly. Information in this post is not current. Please check out this more recent article on rental income for conforming mortgages here. And if I can help you with your investment (or any) property) in Washington state, please contact me!
Rental income is generally not fully credited when qualifying for a mortgage. Lenders will “discount” the rent because of the cost and risk associated with owning investment property. If someone does not have at least two years history as a landlord, they may not be able to use the rental income at all and may have to qualify with the full mortgage payment.
Conventional financing allows a qualified investor to receive credit for 75% of the gross rental income. From this figure, property taxes, insurance, home owners association dues and any mortgage payments are deducted to create the amount of rent (positive or negative) that the lender will use for qualifying purposes.
For example, a property has a $2,000 total mortgage payment (PITI) with no HOA dues and receives rental income of $2,000 per month.
$2,000 rental income x 0.75% = $1,500. $1,500 less the mortgage payment of $2,000 creates a net rental income of negative $500 per month. This would be factored as a debt and not a credit or “breaking even” on the loan application for qualifying.
Of course if there are multiple investors involved, the net rental income is split accordingly.
FHA does not have the same two year history requirement for existing rentals as conventional loans do. The vacancy factor in the Seattle area is 15% which means that 85% of the rent is allowed to be factored as income. FHA loans may use future rental income (no 2 year history) when converting an existing home into a rental if the borrower is being relocated or if there is enough equity in the subject property.
To document rental income, be prepared to provide tax returns and signed lease agreements. Lenders will use the net income from your tax returns.
When you have rental properties, be prepared to have additional reserves (savings) required based on how many properties are owned.
If you have questions about qualifying for a mortgage for a home located in Washington State, please contact me. If you would like a personal rate quote from me for an home located in Washington state, click here.







Recent Comments