Documenting Alternative Credit with FHA Loans

July 15, 2008 by 15 Comments

EDITORS NOTE: This post was originally published in 2008. Underwriting guidelines ALWAYS change. Please contact me if you have any questions.

FHA insured loans, which are quickly becoming the mortgage of choice unless you have 20% down payment and 720 credit scores, allows people to obtain mortgage financing if they are shy on an established credit history reported to the credit bureaus.  Typically, a borrower needs to the following shown on their credit report for it to be considered “established”:

  • At least three trade lines (credit accounts) in good standing.
  • Two of the three trade lines must be at least 12 months old.
  • One trade line must be at least 24 months old.
  • Three credit scores per borrower.

Sometimes, if someone does not have established credit that is reported to the credit bureaus, they need to use “alternative credit” or “non traditional” credit, which may be acceptable with FHA financing.   Proving you have credit that is not reported to the bureaus requires that you obtain documentation from three different sources that you have made on time payments to during the last 12 months.

Possible types of non-traditional credit (preferred–at least one of these types of sources are required):

  • rent payments
  • utilities (telephone, electricity, gas, water, garbage, cable, etc.)–not included in housing payment.

Other acceptable sources of non-traditional credit are (two out of three sources may come here):

  • insurance (medical, auto, life, renter’s, etc).
  • payment to child care providers
  • internet/cell phone service
  • personal loan with terms in writing supported with canceled checks
  • department, furniture, rent-to-own stores, etc.
  • a documented 12 month history of saving by regular deposits (at least quarterly) that are not payroll (automatic) deducted.

Note:  Debts that are paid automatically from your payroll are not allowed to be used in documenting non-traditional credit.  Lenders want to make sure that you are able to make timely payments “voluntary”.

The “form of proof” can be:

  • canceled checks for the last 12 months, or
  • written letter from creditor which is written on their letterhead, includes your name and account number stating the you have made on-time payments during the last twelve months.   The letter should include what the payment amount is and the total amount due.

In order to qualify for a non-traditional credit approval with FHA, over the last 12 months, there must be:

  • No late payments for housing.
  • No collections or court records reporting (with the exception of medical).
  • No more than one 30 day delinquency on payments due to other creditors.

Qualifying ratios are restricted to 31% for the payment to income ratio and 43% for the total debt to income ratio.   Two months reserves (two months mortgage payments in savings after closing) is also required.  When non-traditional credit is used, the mortgage is a “manual underwrite” meaning that you need to allow for more time during the underwriting process as a real live human is underwriting your transaction.

Last but not least, do make sure that you are working with a Mortgage Professional who is qualified to provide FHA mortgage loans.  Not all mortgage companies are approved and, with many products no longer available, they may try to illegally provide an FHA mortgage with hopes of finding another lender to broker it to.  Ask your Mortgage Professional if they have provided FHA loans before, how long and how long their company has been approved for FHA loans.  By the way, I cut my mortgage teeth on FHA 8 years ago and our company has been providing FHA loans since our inception.  (We are a Direct Endorsed HUD lender).  You can always check out HUD’s site to confirm whether or not your lender is approved.

Questions or concerns about FHA (or any) mortgages for Washington State properties?  Contact me.

Filed Under: Credit Scores and Reporting, FHA, Underwriting and Qualifying Tagged With: , ,

Is 5% Down Available for Homes Priced from up to $600,000?

June 3, 2008 by 6 Comments

EDITORS NOTE – August 30, 2009: Mortgage guidelines are constantly changing–please make sure to get updated guidelines from a local mortgage professional.  This post was written under DU 7.0 and at this time, we are utilizing Fannie Mae/DU Version 7.1.

In King, Snohomish and Pierce County, FHA Jumbo will allow you to put 3% down as long as your loan amount is $567,500 or below.   The buyer's required investment is 3% of the sales price (which can be gifted from a family member) and the seller can contribute up to 6%.   Utilizing a FHA Jumbo, one could by $585,000 with as little as 3% down or up to around $595,000 with 5% down and still be within the FHA loan limits.  The debt to income ratios are typically around 43%.   Click here for more information on FHA Jumbo.

At 5% down with a sales price of $585,000, the FHA scenario would look like this:

Principal and interest @ 6.375% (APR 7.140%): $3,514.50 plus monthly mortgage insurance of $231.56 for a sub-total (not including taxes and home owners insurance) of: $3,746.06.

Amount needed to close estimated at $43,000.  Buyer required investment = $17,550 (3% which can be gifted from a family member).

A conforming-jumbo will allow a 90% loan to value but good luck finding a second mortgage that will accommodate that–most second mortgages are limiting their total loan to value of 85%.  Private mortgage insurance is an option up to 90% loan to value with a loan amount of $567,500.  With a sales price of $600,000, 10% down would provide a loan amount of $540,000.   At 10% down, the seller can contribute up to 6% as long as the buyer has invested a minimum of 5% of their own funds into the transaction. 

Principal and interest @ 6.125% (APR 6.373%): $4,555.10 $3,281.10 plus monthly mortgage insurance in the amount of $316.85 for a sub-total (not including taxes and home owners insurance) of: $4,871.95 $3,597.95.

Amount needed to close estimated at $73,000.  Buyers required investment: $30,000 (5% which must be their own funds–gifts from family not included in the 5% down).

Fannie Mae just released DU 7.0 which promises to provide fewer loan approvals and more "expanded approvals".  Before 7.0, 45% was the maximum debt to income ratio. This new version was released on May 31, 2008.

Note:  Both scenarios are assuming mid-credit scores of 720 or better.  A 719 will cause the rate to be 0.125% higher for the jumbo-conforming example or to cost 0.500% more in fee.   For FHA, the rate would remain the same with a 719 score (and down to a 620 mid score).

I think you'll agree that we'll be seeing more FHA approved buyers than before…this is why Sellers and Real Estate Agents should learn more about FHA and be open to FHA buyers…it's not the FHA of yesteryear in fact, FHA is the future.

Filed Under: FHA, Jumbo/Non-Conforming, Residential Purchase

Do you need great credit and a big down payment to buy a home?

May 28, 2008 by Leave a Comment

Cindy, one of my clients that I helped finance their first home, emailed me this question:

"I know home loans have changed a lot but is it true that you can’t get a home loan with a credit score under 700 and 20% down?"

Not true.  Although I’m sure it feels that way and I’ve even heard some in the media make similar wrong statements…it’s no wonder you would have this question.

Having a high credit score and significant down payment certainly doesn’t hurt a home buyer.  It is true that many of the mortgages of recent years are no longer available.  And actually a 700 credit score pays more for their interest rate than someone with a 720 credit score now.   Conventional underwriting guidelines continue to tighten during these historic times.

FHA continues to be a very strong option for home buyers and home owners needing to refinance.   Even when FHA begins to implement risk based pricing for mortgage insurance, as reported by Kenneth R. Harney, borrowers can still have 3% down and lower credit scores:

"On 30-year mortgages with down payments of 10% or more, applicants with FICO scores above 680 will qualify for the lowest premiums — 1.25% of the loan amount upfront and annual renewal premium payments of 0.5. Borrowers with down payments of less than 5% and poor credit scores — FICOs ranging from 500 to 559 — will be charged premiums of 2.25% up front and 0.55% annually. All borrowers will continue to receive the same market-based interest rate. Under the current system, borrowers pay uniform 1.5% premiums upfront and 0.5% annually."

One thing to keep in mind is that borrowers do need to have clean credit (no lates) for the past 12 months.  And even if FHA allows a 500 credit score, many lenders have their own underwriting guidelines that may not allow it and they have higher rates for lower credit scores.

To learn more about FHA, please check out my FHA Resource Center or contact me.   Mortgage Master is proud to have our Full Eagle.  We are a direct endorsed HUD lender…what does this mean to you?   We have an FHA underwriter on site at our King County office…we’ve been providing FHA insured mortgages to Pacific Northwest families for over 30 years.   

Filed Under: Credit Scores and Reporting, FHA, Underwriting and Qualifying

Changes to Conforming Underwriting Guidelines and Why You Should Consider FHA

May 22, 2008 by 2 Comments

A big thanks to Anne for asking me this question:

"I just looked at your blog and didn’t see any mention of upcoming guideline changes.  Any idea what’s on the chopping block this weekend at Fannie and Freddie?"

You see, I’ve written about the changes that are happening with the release of Fannie Mae’s new underwriting guidelines that will take place over Memorial Day weekend…but I did so earlier this week over at Rain City Guide and not at Mortgage Porter.   Please do check out Get Approved before Memorial Day Weekend:  More Changes with Fannie Mae.

In a nutshell, Fannie Mae is anticipating more Expanded Approvals due to tighter underwriting guidelines and fewer approvals.   An Expanded Approval comes with various levels and means that a borrower is receiving an "a-minus" or lower loan approval and a higher interest rate.

This segues into another post I wrote at RCG this week:  Sellers and Agents:  Don’t Rule Out FHA Buyers.   With the new conventional guidelines, I’m anticipating that we are going to have even more FHA buyers.   Just because a borrower is using an FHA mortgage to purchase a home, doesn’t mean that they are subprime or less desirable than buyer using conventional financing.   Remember, the FHA loan limit for a single family dwelling in King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties is $567,500–same as the conforming loan limit. 

A buyer may select FHA over conventional because

  • They are putting less than 20% down.
  • Reduced monthly mortgage insurance.
  • They received an Expanded Approval for a conventional loan and would rather have the lower rate offered by FHA over the higher EA rat

Thanks for your question, Anne!  If you have an idea that you would like me to address at Mortgage Porter, drop me a line.

Filed Under: FHA, Underwriting and Qualifying

It’s Official: Zero Down is Gone

March 21, 2008 by 6 Comments

Iceage_2Unless you’re eligible for VA financing within the conforming loan limits, 100% LTV financing (aka "zero down") is no longer available in the conforming mortgage markets.   

The following products are extinct:

  • Fannie Mae Flex 100
  • Freddie Mac 100
  • My Community Mortgage 100
  • Home Possible 100

If you are short on down payment with credit scores below 680, you should consider FHA financing, which is not as credit score sensitive as conventional programs.  Fannie Mae Flex 97 is still available as well as Home Possible 97.  Both conforming programs allow for 3% down.

Home buyers should also plan on having "reserves" after closing.  The amount of reserves may vary depending on the program from 2 – 6 months of proposed mortgage payments for owner occupied when it’s said and done.   Real estate agents, your first time home buyers may need help with closing costs from Sellers…if they’re willing…in order to meet the reserve account conditions. 

We’re rolling back the underwriting guidelines…not all the way back to the ice age…but close!

If you’re considering buying a home or refinancing, meet with your Mortgage Professional sooner than later so you have time review your credit and consider your options.

Filed Under: Credit Scores and Reporting, Current Affairs, FHA, First Time Home Buyer, Residential Purchase

Shiney New and Temporary Conforming Limits…Not So Fast!

March 7, 2008 by Leave a Comment

I feverishly posted the new FHA and conforming loan limits for Washington State.  It was pretty darn exciting since many of us in the industry were hearing whisper figures of $493k or so and voila, our new FHA and conforming limit for a single family dwelling is $567,500 for King, Snohomish and Pierce Counties.  This could be a nice bump through the end of this year.

The word is out!  Many Seattle, Bellevue, Everett and Tacoma area homeowners are VERY interested and want to take advantage of "conforming rates" now.   Not so fast….sorry.  (Hey…I’m really hoping that on Monday, I’m eating my words…the proof is in the pudding).   So far all that’s happened is that the loan limits have been announced.   This whole process needs to trickle from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and through all the wholesale lenders before those of us on "the streets" can offer you any benefits.   

Be prepared.  I fully expect an "add to rate" on loans from $417,000 – $567,500 (or what ever your area conforming limit is).   This will be to compensate Freddie/Fannie for the additional volumes and risk they are taking on.   The big question is: how much will it be?  My best guess is anywhere from 0.25% to 1.00% to what you currently see for conforming.   

"WHAT?" You say… "You’re telling me that you just quoted 6.00% for conforming today…and 7.00% for JUMBO…yet the new conforming rate for loans over $417,000 may still be 7.00% if I were locking today?"

Yes…that’s what I’m saying.  Again, PURE speculation on my part.

The "new conforming limit" goes back to July of 2007.  It’s retroactive for jumbo mortgages still not bought on Wall Street clogging credit lines.   I think that’s where we may see the most action:  rescuing the Thornburg Mortgages of the world (or at least Wall Street).  This from Bloomberg:

Thornburg specialized in so-called jumbo mortgages of more than $417,000, which typically were used to buy more expensive homes. Until recently, such loans were too big to qualify for purchase by government-sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae. Trading for such “non-conforming loans has come to a standstill, cutting off a source of funds for mortgage companies and pushing down the value of their holdings. More than 100 halted operations or sought buyers last year.

The company’s demise would reduce liquidity even more, said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of HSH Associates, a mortgage- market research firm based in Pompton Plains, New Jersey.

“No one has had anything bad to say about Thornburg; they have served the good-quality, high end of the market,” Gumbinger said. “It’s been a good, well-run business that is taking a beating because of market conditions.”

Thornburg is not a part of the subprime melt down they are being sucked into.  My best guess is that due to the volume and risk of loans that Fannie and Freddie will take on through the end of this year, consumers will see a benefit in pricing when the credit lines have been relieved.   

This may not be the band-aid we’re hoping for.  I don’t want to be a "bummer"…I do want to be practical. 

My best advise to those in the "new (temporary) conforming market" is to not wait for the new limits to be in effect.  Check with your Mortgage Professional to see if they can switch your program to "new conforming" IF it’s a better rate/scenario for you if you’ve all ready began the process under the current guidelines.  This is something that I can offer and I would assume most Mortgage Professionals are able to as well.

Filed Under: FHA, Legislation, Mortgage, Residential Purchase

New FHA Loan Limits are here!

March 6, 2008 by 3 Comments

Great news!  HUD has announced the new FHA loan limits for our area:

King, Snohomish and Pierce Counties

Single Family: $567,500 (up $204,710 from $362,790)

Two Family: $726,500

Three Family: $878,150

Four Family: $1,091,350

San Juan County

Single Family:  $593,750 (up $230,960 from $362,790)

Two Family:  $760,100

Three Family:  $918,800

Four Family:  $1,141,850

Kitsap County

Single Family: $475,000 (up $114,000 from $361,000)

Two Family: $608,100

Three Family: $735,050

Four Family: $913,450

Jefferson County

Single Family: $437,500 (up $105,000 from $332,500)

Two Family: $560,050

Three Family: $677,000

Four Family:  $841,350

Clark County

Single Family:  $418,750 (up $113,800 from $304,950)

Two Family: $536,050

Three Family: $648,000

Four Family:  $805,300

Clallam County

Single Family:  $383,750  (up $158,600 from $225,150)

Two Family: $491,250

Three Family:  $593,800

Four Family:  $738,000

Island County

Single Family:  $381,250 (up to $91,500 from $289,750)

Two Family:  $488,050

Three Family:  $589,950

Four Family:  $733,150

Whatcom County

Single Family:  $375,000 (up to $90,000 from $285,000)

Two Family:  $480,050

Three Family:  $580,300

Four Family:  $721,150

Skagit County

Single Family:  $373,750 (up to $89,767 from $283,983)

Two Family:  $478,450

Three Family:  $578,350

Four Family:  $718,750

Thurston County

Single Family: $361,250 (up to $86,700 from $274,550)

Two Family:  $462,450

Three Family: $559,000

Four Family:  $694,799

Kittitas County

Single Family: $328,750  (up $79,000 from $249,750)

Two Family:  $420,850

Three Family:  $508,700

Four Family:  $632,200

Chelan and Douglas Counties

Single Family:  $323,750 (up $78,200 from $245,550)

Two Family:  $414,450

Three Family:  $500,950

Four Family:  $622,600

Mason County

Single Family:  $310,000 (up $74,400 from $235,600)

Two Family: $396,850

Three Family:  $479,700

Four Family:  $596,150

Benton and Franklin Counties

Single Family:  $275,000 (up $66,085 from $208,905)

Two Family:  $352,050

Three Family:  $425,550

Four Family:  $528,850

Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Cowlitz, Ferry, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Spokane, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whitman and Yakima  Counties

Single Family:  $271,050 (up $70,890 from $200,160)

Two Family:  $347,000

Three Family:  $419,400

Four Family:  $521,250

According to the Wall Street Journal, these figures will also be our temporary conforming loan limits.

"The upper mortgage limits also will apply to loans purchased or guaranteed by government-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHA officials said."

More information will follow as I receive it.  Remember, these higher loan limits are only through the end of 2008.

 

Filed Under: FHA, Mortgage, Refinance, Residential Purchase

Second Mortgages and “Low Down” Mortgages

February 28, 2008 by Leave a Comment

SunTrust Bank, one of the lenders we work with, is joining the ranks of other lenders who are eliminating or shelving their second mortgage products, including their combos where they have the first and second mortgage (such as an 80/10/10).  Where we once had several options for second mortgages and HELOCs, we are down to just a few.

Another bank that is still offering second mortgages (fixed and HELOCs) are limiting the total loan to value to 80% if your mid-credit score is 680-699.  A 700 credit score will allow you to go up to 85% total loan to value.

We do have another option for second mortgages that will go to a higher loan to value with lower credit scores…you pay the price with rates up to 3 points higher than what the other bank offers (with the lower loan to value).

What are your alternatives if you do not have 20 or 15% down? 

  • Seller financing for a second mortgage (private deed of trust subject to approval with underwriting).
  • Private mortgage insurance.  Upfront, monthly or lender paid.
  • FHA insured mortgages (subject to loan limits which will be changing soon)
  • VA insured mortgages

If you are currently preapproved to purchase a home and you are using an 80/10/10 or 80/15/5, I urge you to contact your Mortgage Professional to confirm your preapproval is still valid and to develop a "Plan B" for your home purchase strategy.   Some private mortgage insurance companies are also pulling back on higher loan to value mortgages (this includes lpmi and Fannie Flex); if you’re using less than 10% down with a pmi scenario–check with your Mortgage Professional for "Plan B" as well.

Filed Under: FHA, First Time Home Buyer, Home Equity Loans & Second Mortgages, Mortgage Insurance, Residential Purchase
« Previous Page
Next Page »